Covid-19 swabs produce up to 95% false positives. The note from Dr. Stefano Scoglio
"None of the 78 swab test models in circulation have been evaluated or submitted to any recognized evaluation body"
Once again, Dr. Stefano Scoglio , who we remember having been nominated for the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2018 for his studies on the Klamath algae (present in one of the Oklahoma lakes in the United States of America), presents another very important report concerning the validity of the swabs and their certification, as well as the normative-regulatory situation. In June was mentioned about another work by Scoglio, where the doctor clarified that "the number of deaths in the central period of the 2020 crisis" was absolutely normal, "absolutely average" and therefore there was no been "no pandemic ".
Attached is the doctor's note for those who want to deepen the discord on mortality: ISTAT and national media and the fake news of the increase in national mortality. The ISTAT Mortality Report 20-2 / 31-3 2020 .
In the note on the swabs, however, the doctor makes very heavy statements, for the narrative and the narration that the population has been following for 9 months now, we report them in the following excerpt also because they summarize very briefly and make us understand the study done a few weeks ago (1 October) from Scoglio: "After demonstrating how the same European and American health authorities claim that the virus has never been isolated, as in a boxing one-two, we will now see how the same health authorities, first of all our Higher Institute of Health, admit that Covid-19 swabs are completely unreliable.
We have also seen how this unreliability has even been certified by the European Commission and the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, which in April-May last published documents stating that 78 different swabs were circulating in Europe, none of which validated by independent bodies, none evaluated or authorized in advance, and even the vast majority of whom did not even declare which gene sequences they used , and therefore potentially containing anything ".
A note is also made to the "scientific substance of swabs", in fact Scoglio says that "they are completely meaningless because the virus has never been isolated , and therefore there is no realistic marker to support its action".
The normative-regulatory situation of swabs
We went there to see, because it is very interesting, the normative-regulatory situation of the tampons, which as Scoglio reports “are completely devoid of evaluation and validation “.
Therefore "swabs fall under the new regulation REGULATION (EU) 2017/746 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 5 April 2017 relating to in vitro diagnostic medical devices and which repeals Directive 98/79 / EC".
It is explained that in the previous legislation repealed (98/79 / EC), in general it was enough to affix the CE mark, which is a mark relating above all to safety and that "only for some in vitro diagnostic devices listed in Annex II, and dealing with already known viruses (HIV 1 and 2, HTLV I and II and hepatitis B, C and D), the technical and efficacy evaluation by a Notified Body is required, i.e. a validation body recognized by the EU ". Scoglio draws attention to the fact that according to the European Commission document dated April 16 " none of the 78 swab test models in circulation at that date have been evaluated or submitted to any recognized evaluation body, and that even this would not even have been possible given that almost none of those 78 swabs provide an adequate technical data sheet, including the specification of the gene sequences used ".
The doctor also wonders how it is possible, also because "SARS Cov2 should be a virus even more important than those of hepatitis or HIV, which have never led to the closure of the economy and social life of entire nations" . But he answers his own question by saying that instead "it is possible because the Regulation of Directive 98/79 EC lists only the aforementioned viruses, and since SARS Cov2 is a new virus it is not included".
Then another question arises, namely " why have swab tests been authorized on the market without any validation or even preliminary evaluation, and even without the specifications on the gene sequences used?" , as explained: "if the regulation was repealed by the 2017 regulation, which in turn places even more stringent requirements than the previous one, requiring preliminary efficacy assessments by recognized validation bodies for all in vitro diagnostic devices in which also includes Covids-19 buffers ".
The doctor then states: "Because Italy has made school, and the motto 'made the law found the deception' has become the European motto: the Regulation 2017/46 of April 5, 2017 will come into force, for in vitro diagnostic devices , only May 26, 2022! And with this, the Covid-19 swabs enjoyed the interregnum, not being included, as they relate to a new virus, in the '98 Regulation; and not yet being subjected to a 2017 Regulation that would have outlawed them all, but which will not enter into force until mid-2022! The question that must be asked, and which cannot fail to have legal relevance, is: these swabs are completely devoid of evaluation and validation, and are in circulation only thanks to the fact that a regulatory vacuum has been created between the 1998 Regulation, which limited the list of viruses only to those known (but which by analogy should also apply to new emerging ones) and the 2017 Regulation, which repeals that of '98 but enters into force only in 2022; in short, if these Covid-19 tampons are used only thanks to a legislative anomaly, and in 2022 they would be completely illegal; Is it permissible that the fate of entire nations and of the entire world economy is entrusted to such swabs, alive by pure miracle or legal distortion? Obviously not, it should not be admissible, and if it is, it will be only because the legal form is made to prevail over the legal substance ".
Attached is the doctor's note for those who want to learn more about the validity and efficacy of swabs titled ”THE INVENTED PANDEMIC, the lack of VIRUS ISOLATION and the INVALID COVID-19 test” :
LAWSUIT ON COVID-19 SWABS (With a joint statement Dr. Fabio Franchi, M.D, Expert in Infectious Disease and Virology; Dr. Antonietta Gatti Scientist, Expert in Nanopathologies, Dr. Stefano Montanari, Pharmacist Scientific researcher and Nanopathologist, and Prof. Stefano Scoglio, Scientific Researcher, Nobel Prize Candidate for Medicine 2018) - please check link below :
https://davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/COVID-19-SWAB-TESTS-LAWSUITS.pdf
Below is also video of an interview with Dr Stefano Scolio on the ByoBlu online TV with English subtitles:
https://www.brighteon.com/c0a7eace-fb3e-4d69-9521-5a1dac0cccbf
